Category: Retention

Most organisations try to understand attrition by asking a simple question: Why are people leaving? The answers are often familiar—better opportunities, changing priorities, or challenges with managers. While these explanations are valid, they rarely tell the full story. In reality, attrition tends to build gradually. It’s shaped not just by individual experiences, but also by the systems, expectations, and pressures that surround them, often in ways that aren’t immediately visible.
For years, the future of work has been framed as a battle between the office and everywhere else. One side champions flexibility. The other argues for face-to-face collaboration. Entire workplace strategies have been built around deciding where people should work. Yet perhaps that was never the real question. The assumption behind much of the debate is simple: people dislike the office and want to avoid it whenever possible. But the more you listen to professionals talk about work, the less convincing that explanation becomes. Because most people are not making decisions based on location alone. They’re weighing something far more personal. They’re asking whether the trade-off feels worth it.
Organisations invest significant time and resources in attracting talent. Employer brands are carefully cultivated, hiring processes are refined, and compensation packages are benchmarked against the market.

Search

Topic